Tim Cliffe - Blog

SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 - The UK Pandemic

Published: 2021-07-01. Up-dated (data only) 2021-12-27.

Reading Time: 43 minutes.

Link Dates: All links in this article were accessed on the Published date.

Downloadable Files: All files have been scanned for viruses; however, you are advised to virus scan the files yourself before you open them.

PDF files: This article includes PDF files. A free PDF Reader is available to Adobe Acrobat PDF Reader
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). download.

XLSX files: This article includes a .xlsx file. A free Office Suite is available to Apache Open Office
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). download.

01 Introduction

(01.1) As someone who has been an Education Professional for almost 35 years, I am committed to conveying the truth in a balanced and factual manner.

I have been involved in research and have spent many years working with scientists, in various fields. As a result, I am aware of the importance of pro- and counter arguments in any field of enquiry.

 

(01.2) Anyone who has followed government and Main Stream Media (MSM) coverage of the COVID-19 Pandemic will be aware of the single-sided, single narrative, that has dominated the subject, with any counter-position being denied coverage.

 

(01.3) This is unacceptable and is the reason for writing this article.

02 A Brief Pre-Lockdown History

• 17th November 2019 The first official case of COrona VIrus Disease was reported on November 17th 2019 (COVID-19) in South China Morning Post website
  (External link, opens in a new tab/window). Wuhan, China;
• 30th January 2020 the World Health Organization (WHO) Director-General declared the novel COVID-19 outbreak a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC), the WHO's WHO website
  (External link, opens in a new tab/window). highest level of alarm;
• 11th March 2020 the WHO Director-General declared the novel COVID-19 outbreak National Library of Medicine website
  (External link, opens in a new tab/window). a pandemic;
• 16th March 2020 the UK government announces the UK's first lockdown.

03 Explanation of Terms Used

(03.1) Epidemic: An epidemic disease is one affecting many persons at the same time, and spreading from person to person in a locality where the disease is not permanently prevalent.

 

(03.2) Pandemic: A pandemic is an epidemic occurring over a wide geographical area, e.g., multiple nations, worldwide.

 

(03.3) Attack Rate: Attack Rate is a measure of the rate of infection, for a specific disease, within a population. An Attack Rate of greater than (>) 15 cases per 100,000 people (>15 cases/100,000), for two consecutive weeks, is considered an epidemic.

 

(03.4) Dying FROM a disease: If a person is well and then contracts a disease and that disease kills them, they have died FROM the disease.

 

(03.5) Dying WITH a disease: If someone has a pre-existing condition, for example, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), they may be ill but not at risk of death.
However, should that same person acquire an infection, such a Pneumonia, Influenza or COVID-19 the combination of the effects of both diseases may result in the person's death. The person died WITH COVID-19.

 

(03.6) Death ATTRIBUTED to a disease: This is a broad term, which can include those who die WITH a disease and those who die FROM a disease.

04 A Personal Perspective

(04.1) I was first prompted to question, and seek more information about, the COVID-19 epidemic when the government published its symptoms, for COVID-19, on the 3rd of March 2020.

“The main symptoms of COVID-19 are:

• A high temperature – this means you feel hot to touch on your chest or back (you do not need to measure your temperature);
• A new, continuous cough – this means coughing a lot for more than an hour, or 3 or more coughing episodes in 24 hours (if you usually have a cough, it may be worse than usual);
• [symptom added by the government on 8th of May 2020] A loss or change to your sense of smell or taste – this means you've noticed you cannot smell or taste anything, or things smell or taste different to normal.

Most people with symptoms have at least 1 of these.”

The above is taken from the National Health Service (NHS) NHS website
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). website.

 

(04.2) The reason I was prompted to question is simple, having previously worked with clinicians within the NHS, for three and a half years, developing training materials for Trainee Doctors, I learned a great deal about several disciplines. This learning raised a significant concern regarding the published symptoms.

 

Table 1 gives the COVID-19 symptoms and a small sample of possible causes, to illustrate my concern.

 

 

Remember, government guidance included the statement...

“Most people with symptoms [of COVID-19] have at least 1 of these.”

(04.3) The problem is, the symptoms are far too generic and, therefore, cannot be clinically diagnosed without a COVID-19 specific test, which did not exist at the time.

 

(04.4) It immediately becomes obvious, without a specific test, any one of the 25 diseases in the table above, together with dozens more, could be suspected of being COVID-19.

"In the absence of a COVID-19 specific test, it is not possible to diagnose COVID-19, using the published symptoms, with ANY clinical confidence."

04.01 An Absence of Argument

(04.01.1) As time passed, I became increasingly aware of a lack of argument.

 

(04.01.2) As we all know; any field of science is contentious. Scientists are renowned for disagreeing, arguing, discussing and presenting a plethora of alternative explanations and evidence, which has been, essentially, completely absent in the government's presented position, coverage in the MSM and even including censorship, especially noticeable on the internet, including social media platforms, and within various professions including medicine.

(04.01.3) Dr. Phillips' position is far from isolated.
Dr. Samuel White, a General Practitioner with the NHS, was suspended for raising concerns about the response of the NHS to the COVID-19 pandemic and his resulting Covid Truths website
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). inability to treat patients effectively.
Dr. Samuel White is currently taking legal action against the NHS. The letter, from Dr. White's solicitor, relating to the public interest disclosure (or whistle blow) raising allegations of criminal conduct and breach of legal obligations by the NHS, is available (PJH Law's letter to Sir Simon Stevens (PDF file)
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). solicitor's letter).

 

(04.01.4) Sadly, another example of victimisation and censorship is Dr. Francis Christian, Clinical Professor of General Surgery who was dismissed for voicing concerns about the COVID-19 Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms website
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). injections for children.

 

(04.01.5) In short, my observations regarding the symptoms of COVID-19, the lack of counter argument with regard to the government's response and that of numerous national and international agencies, to COVID-19, has prompted this article, which seeks to present a balance to the presented narrative, so obviously lacking.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14 COVID-19 Injections - Deaths and Serious Injuries Data

14.01 Yellow Card System - UK

(14.01.1) This is the UK equivalent to the USA CDC VAERS Database.

 

(14.01.2) Unfortunately, unlike the CDC VAERS Database, the data on the UK Yellow Card website
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). Yellow Card site are not live or searchable.

 

(14.01.3) Instead, the site provides downloadable reports for a given period of time for each injection, which makes searching for and analysing data far more restrictive, difficult and time consuming. Reports are made available, via a link, on UK Yellow Card Reports website
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). GOV.UK.

 

14.02 Public Health Scotland

(14.02.1) Public Health Scotland is Scotland's executive body for the protection of public health.

 

(14.02.2) As for the other nations of the UK, Public Health Scotland produce reports relating to the COVID-19 situation.

 

(14.02.3) The population of Scotland is only 5,463,300 (mid-2019 - ONS); however, according to Public Health Scotland's COVID-19 Statistical Report for 2021-06-23, a total of 5,522 people have died after receiving a COVID-19 injection.

14.03 EudraVigilance - European Union

(14.03.1) EudraVigilance is the European Union's (EU) Drug Adverse Event Reporting System.
It is similar to the better-known USA's CDC VAERS Database; however, CDC VAERS only reports on vaccines, whereas EudraVigilance reports on all drugs.

 

(14.03.2) As of June 2021, 17,000 deaths were reported by EudraVigilance, resulting from the COVID-19 injections.
This figure is in stark contrast with figures now available. See the figure in Table 3 at 14.04.6.

 

(14.03.3) The following instructions explain how to use the EU's EudraVigilance website, so you can run your own searches. To access data for the COVID-19 injections:

14.04 Search for COVID-19 'Vaccine' Related Adverse Events on EudraVigilance

(14.04.1) Since EudraVigilance's recent maintenance (completed 2021-07-23), it is no longer possible to search for data relating to Death, on the website.

 

(14.04.2) It is possible to search for Serious events, which include Death, by exporting data, produced by running a Line Listing Report and counting the rows in, for example, Excel.

 

(14.04.3) However, accurately identifying Death data is very difficult.
If the first presenting symptom was simply death, The data is first classified as Death (simple to identify using, for example, Filters in Excel); however, if the first presenting symptom was, for example, vomiting and then the person died, the classification is; Vomiting resulting in death. This means every row of data must be interrogated for the occurrence of the word death. To make matters even worse, if the patient presented more than one symptom before dying, each symptom is followed by '...resulting in death'. Therefore, the word death can appear more than once for any data entry (far more complicated).

 

(14.04.4) This change to EudraVigilance's handling of data essentially makes the accurate identification of Death data impossible for the majority of people.

 

(14.04.5) To find the total of Serious Adverse Events (which include Death):

1. Select the Line Listing Tab (see image 5 text, above);
2. From the Seriousness drop-down box, select Serious;
3. Select Run Line Listing Report below the drop-down boxes;
4. Select Export at the bottom left of the first page of results;
5. Select the export file format(s) from the menu;
6. Analyse the data on your computer.

Not helpful at all.

 

(14.04.6) As someone who has designed and built databases, and their Graphical User Interfaces (webpages), I can think of only two explanations why accessing data (from a database) should be made so difficult:

• Gross incompetence. However, looking at other functions of the database, this is clearly not the case;
• A deliberate attempt to make accessing data, of blatantly obvious interest, as difficult (or impossible for most) as possible. This raises the important question, why?

The data in the USA's CDC VAERS Database (see below) is far more accessible and useable.

 

 

From the data above, it is clear females are almost 3 times more likely to be adversely affected by COVID-19 Injections.

14.05 CDC VAERS Database - USA

(14.05.1) The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is a United States government body.
The CDC Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) is a vaccine safety monitoring programme, which provides data on all vaccines used in the USA. The data are available to the public.

 

(14.05.2) The following instructions explain how to use the CDC VAERS Database website, so you can run your own searches. To access data for the COVID-19 injections:

14.06 Search for COVID-19 'Vaccine' Related Deaths on CDC VAERS

(14.06.1) I have executed a number of searches, on the CDC VAERS database, to compare Deaths and Life Threatening Events for All Vaccines to those for the COVID-19 injections.
The search parameters for Deaths were all left at their defaults, with the exception of:

• Symptoms = 10011906 (DEATH);
• Location = All Locations;
• Vaccine characteristics = All (All Vaccine Products);
• Event characteristics = Death.

(14.06.2) I then repeated the search, as above except for Vaccine characteristics = COVID19 (COVID19 VACCINE).

 

(14.06.3) Finally, I repeated the above searches but set Event characteristics to Life Threatening and Symptoms to All. The results of the searches are shown in the table below.

 

 

(14.06.4) These data are truly catastrophic.
In only seven months (2021-07-01), the COVID-19 injections accounted for almost half of all deaths and a third of all life-threatening injuries in the last 31 years. As can be seen from the later searches, the situation is worsening.

 

(14.06.5) As if this isn't bad enough, research, published by Elsevier (September 2020), indicates the COVID-19 injections cross the Blood-brain Barrier (BBB) ((access PDF file)
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). read the research).
With the exception of nutrients, nothing should cross the BBB.

 

 

14.07 A History of Rushed Vaccine Disasters

(14.07.1) There is a history of rushing 'vaccines' for SARS-COV viruses. In 1976 a Swine Flu outbreak prompted panic and a rushed vaccine. The vaccination programme was eventually stopped.
Unlike the tens of thousands of deaths from the COVID-19 injections, in 1976 it took just New York Times website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). 3 deaths to halt vaccination, which eventually became the case across the entire country.

 

(14.07.2) Following the Swine Flu outbreak of 2009-2010, the Pandemrix vaccine, made by GlaxoSmithKline, was withdrawn when 53 people had died after receiving the vaccine.
In addition, doctors also noticed a sharp rise in WebMD website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). Narcolepsy among those receiving the vaccine, a condition which is increasingly being reported as a side-effect of the COVID-19 injections, together with fears about Undercurrents website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). sterility and Antibody-Dependent Enhancement ( The Defender website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). ADE).

 

(14.07.3) With the average age of people whose deaths are attributed to COVID-19, in the UK, being 82 years-of-age and the likelihood of people surviving COVID-19 being greater than 99.9%, why are so many people being allowed to die from the COVID-19 injections?

 

(14.07.4) It is important to note, the average (Mean) age of death in 2018 was 81.1 years ( Office for National Statistics website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). ONS).
As the average age of death attributed to COVID-19 is greater than the average age of death nationally, these simple figures prove, in terms of the number of deaths, the same number of people would have died anyway as part of the average number of deaths per year. In other words, contrary to what the government has claimed, there are no excess deaths. If there are no excess deaths, there is no pandemic.

 

(14.07.5) Concerns regarding the COVID-19 injections are increased further by research proving infection by SARS-COV-2 results in long-lasting immunity.
SARS-COV-2 infection induces long-lived bone marrow plasma cells [immunity] in humans. Nature Journal: 2021-05-24 (Nature Journal website.
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). read the research).

 

(14.07.6) This raises an obvious question. After almost 18 months of 'pandemic' during which the nation has been exposed to the virus, why is the UK government (and others) obsessed with 'vaccination'?

15 More Recently

(15.1) Now we have the Nepal and Indian (or Delta) variants, two more in a long list, which includes the Chinese, Tai, Indian (reads like a take-away), Brazilian, English, Kent, and Triple Yorkshire. For a virus to produce a new variant, on average, roughly every month is bordering on impossible.
However, with the points raised at 07.02 Concerns for the COVID-19 Injections, the question is, variants of what?

 

(15.2) Before 2020, during a summer, if you asked what someone was suffering from if they had a headache, sore throat and a runny nose, the answer would have been Hay Fever. Not anymore, it's Delta (Indian) COVID-19.

 

(15.3) During the summer, 'cases' of COVID-19 have assumed biblical proportions. The fact that any virus runs-down, not up, appears to be ignored.

 

 

(15.4) It is likely many readers will not be familiar with much of what is contained within this article and may find it difficult to accept their beliefs have been deliberately manipulated by institutions and agencies that should be trustworthy and beyond question.
However, if there are still any doubts, perhaps solicitor Testimony of Dr. Reiner Fuellmich
(External link, opens in a new tab/window). Dr. Reiner Fuellmich, of the German Corona Investigative Committee, may convince you to question.

 

16 My Final Analysis

(16.1) Earlier versions of this article did not provide my explanation of the real reason for events since early 2020.
Following recent announcements, that can now be addressed.

 

(16.2) In the UK, and abroad, there have been indications governments were considering the introduction of Vaccine Passports. These ideas have then been dismissed only to re-surface at a later date.
Initially, these Digital forms of Identification (D-ID) were only going to serve as so-called Vaccine Passports; however, as time progressed, it has been suggested D-IDs could be used to include a wide range of personal data. Not only that, D-IDs would not simply be national but would use a standardised global system.

 

(16.3) Now, the UK has the innocently titled NHS COVID Pass, also known as a D-ID.
It is important to remember, this D-ID has the ability to store and access far more than whether or not someone has received an injection. It is also capable of connecting with a global system.
This development is one of the events I was waiting for before I could write this final part to my article.

 

(16.4) The second development I have been waiting for involves finance.
Many will remember the economic crash of 2008 and its appalling toll on 100s of millions of people world-wide. Of course, the Austerity continues to this day. Since then, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has issued, at least, yearly warnings to governments and financial institutions, warning them of their need to stop the behaviour that led to the 2008 crash.

 

(16.5) To fully understand the comments that follow, unless you already understand how the economy and debt works, it will be helpful to watch the following video.

(16.6) However, as the IMF, and now you, understand it was not, and still isn't, possible for governments or financial institutions to change their behaviour. So why did the IMF bother?
It doesn't stop there. When Gordon Brown was Prime Minister (UK), he promised to end the Boom and Bust cycles of the economy. He knew, as do you, that was not, and is not, possible. But governments don't lie.

 

(16.7) As you now also understand, after each Boom and Bust cycle, the economy emerges with progressively lower sustainable interest rates. Remember the days when an ordinary bank account paid 8% interest. What is now, 0%, 0.1%? Then deduct the tax on that interest, then deduct inflation. In real terms, your money is depreciating.

 

(16.8) After 2008, interest rates hit 0% (self-destruct mechanism activated). Of course, the Government and the Bank of England presented this in a very positive light. But now you know better. But governments don't lie?

 

(16.9) There was a time when a currency's value was determined by how much Gold was backing it. If you look at a British bank note, the Bank of England writes "I promise to pay the bearer on demand the sum of [the value of the bank note]"; this means in Gold.
The Bank of England broke that promise when the UK Government abandoned the Gold standard. But governments don't lie?

(16.10) You may not be overly concerned you can't get your Gold. That's not the point, the point is, there is no Gold and that is important.

 

(16.11) Since the 1970s, most currencies have abandoned the Gold standard. Such currencies are known as Fiat currencies. As you now understand, Fiat currencies have made it possible for the debt-centric nature of modern Western economies to flourish, which has included the ability to delay the inevitable, but not for much longer. As you now know, the clock, on the self-destruct time-bomb, has been ticking since 2008.

 

(16.12) At this point, it's worth repeating a point proven earlier in this article. The UK is bankrupt.
Having watched Video 5, You are now aware, governments and central banks cannot afford for people to run to the bank and withdraw their money. So, what is the solution, how do you solve the problem of money? Remove it altogether.
Unfortunately, there are two major obstacles:

• There must be a national digital identity scheme to keep track of everything and everyone and what they 'spend';
• There must be a digital currency to replace the old money.

 

(16.13) The obvious alternative, to bank notes and coinage, in the age of the internet is electronic money, such as Bitcoin. What can be more democratic than money independent of the State and Central Banks, money that no one controls?
But that's the problem, controlling money is of itself immensely powerful; however, the powerful and wealthy have no appetite for losing that.

 

(16.14) Obviously, governments would much prefer their own Digital Currency to retain the power conveyed by controlling money, as would the rich elite.

 

(16.15) If everything and anything can be bought digitally, from a pint of beer to a house, there needs to be a very robust system in place. A bank card with a four-digit pin is not good enough. This is where the National Digital Identity System comes in, which can just as easily be global, of course.

 

(16.16) Government and elites retain control of money, but they now have something they never had before, total control over you.

 

(16.17) When the next crash comes and you now know it's imminent, you can't run to the bank and withdraw your savings because there's no such thing as cash anymore.
But things are already bad. When the crash happens, you can't even withdraw your pension savings (cash or not), because they're locked-in.
The difference between now and 2008, is the government has since enacted laws so everyone has a private pension scheme. But governments can be trusted.

 

(16.18) Those who remember the crash of 2008 will remember 100s of millions of people's pensions were made almost worthless. In the UK, not one single 'Banker' went to gaol for what happened. At the time, the reputation of 'Bankers' was worse than the Spanish Inquisition.

 

(16.19) In 2010, The UK Government introduced The Bribery Act. The Bribery Act includes a legal instrument called the Deferred Prosecution Agreement (DPA). The DPA has the effect that regardless of what an individual does, within the finance sector, they will not go to gaol, instead, the company will be fined. In short, it's a never go to gaol card. The DPA protects the very institutions the government relies upon. Similar laws were also passed in other countries.
Now ask yourself, what happened to all that money, where did it go? Who runs the pension schemes? The financial institutions. They got the money, you lost your pension and no one goes to gaol. But governments can be trusted

 

(16.20) A major obstacle to a National Digital Identity System is, many countries don't have one. In fact, most, if not all, countries who do not have an Identity System, have a population who are culturally averse to, and totally oppose, the idea. So how do governments go about overcoming such an obstacle, an obstacle that must be removed.

 

(16.21) Having watched Video 5, you now understand the next economic collapse is imminent and unavoidable. Interest rates are already at 0% (and have been for some time) and cannot be lowered further. The only option left is to print new money to stimulate the Stock Market. A process now called Quantitative Easing instead of Printing Money.
But, you now understand that is not sustainable and it's already been happening for years. You now know Printing Money leads to inflation, which unchecked results in worthless money; exactly what happened to Germany after the First World War.

 

(16.22) That leaves another possible alternative, bite the bullet and let the Stock Market collapse.
No. That can't be allowed because 60% of taxes are paid by the top 5% of income earners, and the top 5% don't need to work very hard because most of their income comes from the Stock Market. Without the Stock Market huge amounts of taxes are lost.
Government income is financed by taxation and borrowing against future taxation. Lose taxes and you lose everything taxes pay for; welfare, health services, social services, military, police, the list goes on. At this point, people on ordinary incomes have lost their jobs and all that entails, which leads to rioting and ultimately revolution. The powerful and wealthy definitely don't want a revolution.

 

(16.23) Governments and the elite need a solution for transitioning to a new monetary system that retains their power.
The Chinese already have a solution, create your own digital currency linked to the existing national digital identity system, which goes in the opposite direction of a stateless money system, and massively increases the power of the state.

 

(16.24) So, governments and the elite are in a desperate race to solve two big problems:

• How to make the population accept a digital identity system;
• How to create their own Digital Currency.

Remember, the clock is ticking.

 

(16.25) I believe it is obvious, bearing in mind everything presented here and what has come to pass, everything since March 2020 has not been about a new dangerous virus, it simply isn't that dangerous. The government's lies are exposed everywhere.
The purpose has been to bring about a circumstance to convince the people of the need to accept a National Digital Identity Scheme, which removes one of the significant obstacles to achieving the desired new economic order. A new economic order you know is rapidly approaching, one way or another.

 

(16.26) Video 6 shows a report about China's new Social Credit System. The result of National Digital Identities combined with a Digital Currency. However, China has one major advantage over the West, Gold, vast amounts of Gold (real money to support the system).

(16.27) China is almost a decade ahead of the West in this regard. Which is why China banned Bitcoin in preparation for their own Digital Currency to go live.

 

(16.28) However, and this is significant, China is the world's largest producer of Gold. The Chinese government has been keeping that Gold (intrinsic value) in reserve, vast reserves; probably the largest on the planet. Hold that thought.

 

(16.29) China has been planning to seize control of the worlds Reserve Currency Status, which has been held by the USA for decades.
Like the West, China is well aware of the frailties of our economic system and have been waiting for the $USD to reach the end of the road. Global Reserve Currency status brings huge benefits including the exchange for all oil transactions, which is an enormous market and the root of much of the USA's power since the end of the Second World War.

 

(16.30) The emergence of a digital currency, combined with China's social credit system, backed by a vast and independent Gold reserve presents a perfect opportunity to break the dominance of the $USD, achieve Reserve Currency Status and bring an already culturally compliant population under even greater control.

 

(16.31) This, in part, explains western government and other agency behaviours. Western populations are inherently less compliant. Many are suspicious, and rightly so, of untested experimental injections with an increasingly reported and an increasing ability to kill or seriously injure.
When was the last time you remember a government threatening its people if they did not accept an injection; restricting social access, restricting travel, removal of Human Rights, promoting hatred between the 'vaxxed' and the 'unvaxxed', public commentators stating the 'unvaxxed' should not be allowed to work, access health care or buy food, blaming the 'unvaxxed' for increases in deaths and cases when the 'vaxxed' are dying and comprise the higher percentage of so-called new cases? This is very, very wrong!
No one appears to be asking the obvious question, "Why are the 'unvaxxed' not dying in their thousands and why are they in a minority of so-called new cases?", which has been widely reported.

 

(16.32) This is a fact, 99.9% of people contracting COVID-19 survive, this is a government statistic.
Freedom of Information Requests have proven there have been no excess burials or cremations since the 'pandemic' began, so where are all the excess dead? Why the panic, coercion and threats to force people to accept an untested and experimental injection?
Consider this, if cancer had a 99.9% survival rate would you have Chemo-Therapy just in case?
Before 2020, how many times did you go to the doctor and demand to be tested because you didn't have any symptoms?
Before 2020, would you have even considered giving your child an untested experimental injection in order to protect yourself?

 

(16.33) Governments are trying to force their people into a 'Brave New World'. One with a social credit system underpinning the government that monitors and scores every purchase you make, and scores your value to them.

 

(16.34) If we want to be free, all we need do is become ungovernable, and resist long enough for the house of cards to come down by itself.
It will not be pleasant. We will be back where we were after the 2008 crash, in fact, it will probably be worse. The difference is, you will not be living like the Chinese and your children will grow-up free of total control by the state.

 

(16.35) If you are still not convinced to even think about questioning what has been happening since early 2020, here is my last-ditch attempt to encourage you to reconsider.
Video 6 shows an interview with Ray Dalio who discusses the prevailing economic climate.

Use of this Article

Any part, or all, of this article may be linked-to or copied for non-commercial purposes. Any linked or copied content to include the following...

 

SARS-COV-2 and COVID-19 - The UK Pandemic by Tim Cliffe © 1997-2024.

 

Where use will be for commercial purposes, seek authorisation, including details of proposed use, via the Contact page.

 

Return to the Blog page.